HUDIX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HUDIX (Huber Large Cap Value Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - HUDIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Huber Funds, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, HUDIX returned 10.29%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUDIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Large Cap Value Fund (HUDIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUDIX achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 3.18% return.

HUDIX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 4.64%
• 1Y: 16.41%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HUDIX Huber Large Cap Value Fund	5.32%	10.58%	21.95%	10.85%	-2.96%	23.20%	-3.50%	30.44%	-13.48%	21.24%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	3.18%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HUDIX and FSPGX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.68

The correlation between HUDIX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HUDIX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUDIX

HUDIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
HUDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
HUDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
HUDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
HUDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
HUDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Large Cap Value Fund (HUDIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUDIX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.32	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	1.83	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	1.32	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	4.33	+4.88

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUDIX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUDIX drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUDIX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUDIX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.14%	-32.66%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.13%	-16.17%	+10.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.86%	-23.32%	+4.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.86%	-32.66%	+13.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-5.35%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-6.36%	+1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	4.92%	-3.09%

Volatility

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Huber Large Cap Value Fund (HUDIX) is 3.86%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that HUDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUDIX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	5.94%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	12.61%	-3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	16.21%	-4.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	21.61%	-5.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	21.56%	-3.06%

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUDIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUDIX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

HUDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
HUDIX Huber Large Cap Value Fund	1.04%	1.10%	1.09%	1.50%	1.40%	1.14%	1.48%	1.16%	1.53%	1.44%	1.57%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUDIX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

HUDIX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HUDIX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to HUDIX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUDIX dropped -37.14% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HUDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.