PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUBBX vs. ENIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUBBX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than ENIAX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBBX has underperformed ENIAX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while ENIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.17% annualized return.


HUBBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.26%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
2.02%

ENIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.93%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
4.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUBBX
Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund
0.97%4.32%4.91%4.98%-0.50%-0.46%1.27%2.55%1.27%0.80%
ENIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund
1.52%6.14%8.34%7.94%-1.16%2.67%2.47%5.82%1.82%3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HUBBX and ENIAX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.14

The correlation between HUBBX and ENIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUBBX vs. ENIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBBX
HUBBX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HUBBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ENIAX
ENIAX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
ENIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ENIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUBBXENIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.81

4.44

-1.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.29

14.18

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

60.34

87.74

-27.39

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBBX Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is comparable to the ENIAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBBX and ENIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUBBXENIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32

5.58

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.21

1.65

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.54

1.50

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

0.67

+1.51

Drawdowns

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBBX drawdown since its inception was -2.53%, smaller than the maximum ENIAX drawdown of -33.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBBX and ENIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUBBXENIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-33.30%

+30.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.29%

-0.37%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-2.11%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.76%

-3.52%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.53%

-13.45%

+10.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-7.79%

+7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.06%

0.00%

Volatility

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX) has a higher volatility of 0.24% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX) at 0.21%. This indicates that HUBBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUBBXENIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

0.21%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.62%

0.69%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82%

0.95%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.89%

2.86%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.80%

2.79%

-1.99%

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUBBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ENIAX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUBBX vs. ENIAX - Dividend Comparison

HUBBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than ENIAX's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund
5.93%6.00%6.78%5.33%4.07%2.66%2.96%4.32%3.96%3.02%2.75%2.54%
HUBBX
Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund
4.90%4.95%4.14%1.00%0.00%0.54%2.17%1.63%0.86%0.50%0.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUBBX and ENIAX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBBX has higher volatility (0.24%) compared to ENIAX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBBX dropped -2.53% vs ENIAX's -33.30%.

ENIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 4.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUBBX and ENIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer