HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) and EMAS.L (SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - HTWN.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD while EMAS.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HTWN.L returned 24.32%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for EMAS.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTWN.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EMAS.L.

Performance

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) and SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HTWN.L is traded in GBp, while EMAS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMAS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWN.L achieves a 71.35% return, which is significantly lower than EMAS.L's 81.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HTWN.L has outperformed EMAS.L with an annualized return of 24.32%, while EMAS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 15.67% annualized return.

HTWN.L

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 20.41%
• YTD: 71.35%
• 6M: 76.45%
• 1Y: 124.97%
• 3Y*: 42.23%
• 5Y*: 23.93%
• 10Y*: 24.32%

EMAS.L

• 1D: 38.70%
• 1M: 51.83%
• YTD: 81.21%
• 6M: 83.22%
• 1Y: 120.08%
• 3Y*: 35.88%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 15.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	71.35%	23.15%	27.50%	21.28%	-20.57%	29.44%	31.41%	29.56%	-2.68%	15.90%
EMAS.L SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF	81.21%	22.99%	12.85%	0.63%	-12.26%	-4.94%	23.72%	13.21%	-9.79%	29.84%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWN.L and EMAS.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2012	0.51

Over the past year, HTWN.L and EMAS.L have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HTWN.L	EMAS.L
Technology	81.7%	44.9%
Financial Services	10.4%	14.9%
Industrials	2.3%	7.5%
Basic Materials	1.9%	3.9%
Communication Services	1.3%	7.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.7%	2.5%
Healthcare	0.6%	3.3%
Energy	-	2.9%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWN.L

HTWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HTWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HTWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HTWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HTWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EMAS.L

EMAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
EMAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EMAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EMAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EMAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EMAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) and SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTWN.L	EMAS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.49	2.85	+2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.35	7.46	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	2.09	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.03	10.86	+3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.67	35.47	+3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.49, which is higher than the EMAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWN.L and EMAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTWN.L	EMAS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.49	2.85	+2.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	0.63	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.49	0.71	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.58	+0.55

Drawdowns

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWN.L drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum EMAS.L drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWN.L and EMAS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTWN.L	EMAS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.84%	-34.79%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-11.14%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.76%	-17.88%	-11.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.97%	-29.16%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.97%	-34.79%	+4.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-11.69%	+4.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.42%	-0.20%

Volatility

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) is 9.55%, while SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L) has a volatility of 33.13%. This indicates that HTWN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTWN.L	EMAS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	33.13%	-23.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.18%	35.88%	-17.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.65%	42.40%	-19.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.85%	24.78%	-3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.41%	22.18%	+1.23%

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWN.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTWN.L vs. EMAS.L - Dividend Comparison

HTWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while EMAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMAS.L SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	0.95%	1.61%	1.17%	2.79%	3.04%	1.11%	1.79%	2.12%	2.55%	2.04%	2.32%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTWN.L and EMAS.L in my portfolio?

HTWN.L and EMAS.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTWN.L or EMAS.L?

On fees, HTWN.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTWN.L or EMAS.L?

HTWN.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAS.L.

What is the main difference between HTWN.L and EMAS.L?

HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while EMAS.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HTWN.L and 0.55% for EMAS.L.