HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTWG.L (L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF) and 3191.HK (Global X China Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTWG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while 3191.HK is a China Equities fund tracking the Factset China Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTWG.L returned 2.77%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for 3191.HK. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTWG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for 3191.HK.

Performance

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HTWG.L is traded in GBp, while 3191.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3191.HK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HTWG.L having a 57.21% return and 3191.HK slightly lower at 56.76%.

HTWG.L

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 8.95%
• YTD: 57.21%
• 6M: 52.03%
• 1Y: 116.48%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: 2.77%
• 10Y*: —

3191.HK

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 22.06%
• YTD: 56.76%
• 6M: 65.04%
• 1Y: 132.65%
• 3Y*: 27.00%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HTWG.L L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF	57.21%	30.68%	-6.72%	-8.50%	-29.54%	-27.07%
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF	56.76%	30.80%	13.66%	-11.22%	-32.14%	12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWG.L and 3191.HK is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021	0.17

The correlation between HTWG.L and 3191.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWG.L

HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

3191.HK

3191.HK Risk / Return Rank: 87
3191.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
3191.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
3191.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 82
3191.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
3191.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTWG.L	3191.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.05	3.60	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.70	3.93	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.52	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.66	7.10	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.53	17.76	+2.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.05, which is comparable to the 3191.HK Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWG.L and 3191.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTWG.L	3191.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.05	3.60	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.28	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	0.21	-0.29

Drawdowns

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -63.70%, roughly equal to the maximum 3191.HK drawdown of -61.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWG.L and 3191.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTWG.L	3191.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.70%	-61.28%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-19.37%	+4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.33%	-39.28%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.98%	-61.28%	+4.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.89%	-6.71%	-3.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.92%	-30.32%	-12.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	7.65%	-2.00%

Volatility

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) is 10.99%, while Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that HTWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3191.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTWG.L	3191.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.99%	16.65%	-5.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.16%	28.60%	-10.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.63%	38.24%	-9.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.12%	40.05%	-13.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.48%	39.33%	-12.85%

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than 3191.HK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTWG.L vs. 3191.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTWG.L nor 3191.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTWG.L and 3191.HK in my portfolio?

HTWG.L and 3191.HK have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTWG.L or 3191.HK?

On fees, HTWG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTWG.L or 3191.HK?

HTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for 3191.HK.

What is the main difference between HTWG.L and 3191.HK?

HTWG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while 3191.HK is China Equities. HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while 3191.HK tracks Factset China Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTWG.L and 0.68% for 3191.HK.