PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTO vs. MO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HTO vs. MO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in H2O America (HTO) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTO achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, HTO has underperformed MO with an annualized return of 6.46%, while MO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.79% annualized return.


HTO

1D
-2.16%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
16.55%
6M
22.56%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
-6.63%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
6.46%

MO

1D
-1.25%
1M
4.65%
YTD
25.71%
6M
27.02%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
16.08%
10Y*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTO vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTO
H2O America
16.55%2.92%-22.57%-17.78%13.40%7.66%-0.43%30.19%-11.20%16.22%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
25.71%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%24.18%-10.21%7.87%-27.14%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HTO and MO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 1972

0.14

The correlation between HTO and MO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HTO:

$2.17B

MO:

$119.27B

EPS

HTO:

$2.90

MO:

$4.79

PE Ratio

HTO:

19.40

MO:

14.87

PEG Ratio

HTO:

2.01

MO:

0.32

PS Ratio

HTO:

2.50

MO:

5.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

HTO:

$816.28M

MO:

$21.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HTO:

$335.79M

MO:

$14.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

HTO:

$273.35M

MO:

$11.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTO vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTO
HTO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTO vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H2O America (HTO) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.76

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

4.45

-2.64

HTO vs. MO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the MO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTO and MO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

1.29

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.78

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.34

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.69

-0.30

Drawdowns

HTO vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTO drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, smaller than the maximum MO drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTO and MO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.53%

-65.43%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.72%

-16.40%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.31%

-16.40%

-20.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.85%

-25.83%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.85%

-53.69%

+10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.79%

-4.37%

-21.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-11.93%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.33%

6.49%

+0.84%

Volatility

HTO vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for H2O America (HTO) is 6.28%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that HTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

6.69%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

17.32%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.32%

22.53%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

20.64%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

22.96%

+6.61%

Dividends

HTO vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

HTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than MO's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTO
H2O America
3.06%3.43%3.25%2.33%1.77%1.86%1.85%1.69%2.01%1.63%1.45%2.63%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
5.89%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%

Financials

HTO vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H2O America and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
183.29M
5.43B
(HTO) Total Revenue
(MO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HTO vs. MO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between H2O America and Altria Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
64.6%
Portfolio components
HTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 183.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

HTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported an operating income of 37.43M and revenue of 183.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

HTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported a net income of 19.01M and revenue of 183.29M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HTO and MO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MO has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to HTO (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTO dropped -54.53% vs MO's -65.43%.

MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTO and MO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer