PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Legal & General Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTMW.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTMW.DE achieves a 54.80% return, which is significantly higher than RENW.DE's 43.00% return.


HTMW.DE

1D
-1.27%
1M
3.24%
YTD
54.80%
6M
48.70%
1Y
106.04%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*

RENW.DE

1D
-1.77%
1M
4.66%
YTD
43.00%
6M
41.09%
1Y
80.00%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTMW.DE
Legal & General Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
54.80%25.34%-2.43%-6.52%-32.92%-25.69%
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
43.00%35.27%-9.64%-11.30%-3.32%-10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HTMW.DE and RENW.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021

0.83

The correlation between HTMW.DE and RENW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTMW.DE
HTMW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HTMW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTMW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTMW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HTMW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTMW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

RENW.DE
RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTMW.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTMW.DERENW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.56

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.28

9.22

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.59

34.50

-13.91

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTMW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is comparable to the RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTMW.DE and RENW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTMW.DERENW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

3.49

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.41

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.49

-0.58

Drawdowns

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTMW.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.93%, which is greater than RENW.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTMW.DE and RENW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTMW.DERENW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.93%

-43.93%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-8.63%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.07%

-35.00%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.56%

-42.30%

-15.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.80%

-3.64%

-8.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.55%

-17.33%

-25.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

2.31%

+2.82%

Volatility

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Legal & General Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTMW.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) at 8.24%. This indicates that HTMW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RENW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTMW.DERENW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.53%

8.24%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.57%

16.85%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.96%

22.80%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.47%

22.02%

+4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.64%

22.48%

+4.16%

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HTMW.DE and RENW.DE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

HTMW.DE vs. RENW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTMW.DE nor RENW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HTMW.DE and RENW.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HTMW.DE and RENW.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

HTMW.DE is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while RENW.DE is Energy Equities. HTMW.DE tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while RENW.DE tracks Solactive Clean Energy.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTMW.DE and RENW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer