PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTDIX vs. GOIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund (HTDIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTDIX achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly higher than GOIIX's 7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, HTDIX has underperformed GOIIX with an annualized return of 7.36%, while GOIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.75% annualized return.


HTDIX

1D
0.31%
1M
6.01%
YTD
8.49%
6M
8.57%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
7.36%

GOIIX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.78%
6M
8.46%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTDIX
Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund
8.49%12.92%18.32%12.48%-15.78%17.64%4.37%14.00%-5.63%14.81%
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
7.78%15.03%14.81%15.16%-15.86%12.65%12.73%19.16%-8.63%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HTDIX and GOIIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.79

The correlation between HTDIX and GOIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (5 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTDIX vs. GOIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTDIX
HTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GOIIX
GOIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GOIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GOIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund (HTDIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTDIXGOIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

2.37

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

3.33

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.87

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.41

12.67

+0.74

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the GOIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTDIX and GOIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTDIXGOIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.37

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.72

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.78

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Drawdowns

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTDIX drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum GOIIX drawdown of -43.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTDIX and GOIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTDIXGOIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-43.63%

+25.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-7.17%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.08%

-12.19%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-23.78%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.08%

-25.07%

+6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-6.41%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.62%

-0.01%

Volatility

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Volatility Comparison

Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund (HTDIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTDIXGOIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.65%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

6.99%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

8.69%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.38%

10.65%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.15%

11.27%

+0.88%

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTDIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GOIIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTDIX vs. GOIIX - Dividend Comparison

HTDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
7.96%7.98%9.79%1.97%5.09%6.80%3.47%2.29%3.04%2.73%1.37%3.99%
HTDIX
Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.92%0.00%14.07%0.00%0.69%0.36%0.65%1.29%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, HTDIX and GOIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GOIIX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to HTDIX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTDIX dropped -18.08% vs GOIIX's -43.63%.

GOIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTDIX and GOIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer