HTD vs. HPS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HTD (John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund) and HPS (John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III) are both mutual funds - HTD is a Dividend fund managed by John Hancock, while HPS is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, HTD returned 8.68%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for HPS. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.01% expense ratio.

Performance

HTD vs. HPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTD achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than HPS's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, HTD has outperformed HPS with an annualized return of 8.68%, while HPS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.99% annualized return.

HTD

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: 12.65%
• YTD: 14.21%
• 1Y: 17.01%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

HPS

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 3.56%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: 4.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTD vs. HPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund	14.21%	15.87%	25.68%	-9.92%	-6.24%	32.36%	-16.54%	42.77%	-9.13%	16.47%
HPS John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III	5.00%	4.86%	15.65%	7.66%	-16.56%	16.44%	-3.00%	31.43%	-8.37%	14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HTD and HPS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2004	0.46

The correlation between HTD and HPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HTD vs. HPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTD

HTD Risk / Return Rank: 47
HTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
HTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
HTD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
HTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
HTD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

HPS

HPS Risk / Return Rank: 24
HPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
HPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
HPS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
HPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
HPS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTD vs. HPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HTD	HPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.10	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.57	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.20	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	1.39	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.64	3.61	+4.03

HTD vs. HPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the HPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTD and HPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HTD vs. HPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTD drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, roughly equal to the maximum HPS drawdown of -70.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTD and HPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTD	HPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.79%	-70.04%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-7.61%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.94%	-17.58%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.58%	-29.39%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.57%	-52.12%	-4.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.04%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-8.34%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.92%	-0.69%

Volatility

HTD vs. HPS - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS) at 2.52%. This indicates that HTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTD	HPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	2.52%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	7.35%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	9.66%	+2.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.78%	15.67%	+2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.63%	21.47%	+1.16%

HTD vs. HPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HTD and HPS have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HTD vs. HPS - Dividend Comparison

HTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, less than HPS's 9.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HPS John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III	9.20%	9.16%	8.78%	9.34%	9.15%	7.04%	7.63%	7.41%	9.26%	7.82%	8.27%	7.53%
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund	7.33%	7.51%	7.52%	8.73%	7.36%	5.80%	7.97%	6.06%	10.09%	8.85%	7.30%	7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTD and HPS in my portfolio?

HTD and HPS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTD or HPS?

HTD has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to HPS (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTD dropped -69.79% vs HPS's -70.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.