HPS vs. PFFA
HPS (John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III) and PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, HPS returned 2.79%/yr vs 6.18%/yr for PFFA. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HPS charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for PFFA.
Performance
HPS vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPS achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 2.55% return.
HPS
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 10.96%
- 3Y*
- 11.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
PFFA
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 11.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- —
HPS vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPS John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III | 3.62% | 4.86% | 15.65% | 7.66% | -16.56% | 16.44% | -3.00% | 31.43% | -7.37% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 2.55% | 8.22% | 16.11% | 26.45% | -20.91% | 23.53% | -7.87% | 31.99% | -7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPS and PFFA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between HPS and PFFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPS vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank
HPS
PFFA
HPS vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HPS | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.83 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 6.05 | -2.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HPS vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPS drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, roughly equal to the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPS and PFFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPS | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.04% | -70.52% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.61% | -6.49% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.58% | -12.15% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.39% | -22.70% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -2.00% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -6.62% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.95% | +0.95% |
Volatility
HPS vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 2.16%. This indicates that HPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPS | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 2.16% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 5.92% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 7.16% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 11.54% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 31.75% | -10.28% |
HPS vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPS has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPS vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison
HPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, less than PFFA's 9.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPS John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III | 9.25% | 9.16% | 8.78% | 9.34% | 9.15% | 7.04% | 7.63% | 7.41% | 9.26% | 7.82% | 8.27% | 7.53% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 9.76% | 9.47% | 9.18% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPS and PFFA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HPS has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to PFFA (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPS dropped -70.04% vs PFFA's -70.52%.
PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HPS and PFFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer