HTAB vs. CAFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) and CAFX (Congress Intermediate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HTAB returned 6.59% vs 3.34% for CAFX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTAB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CAFX.

Performance

HTAB vs. CAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAB achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than CAFX's 0.18% return.

HTAB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: 3.14%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: —

CAFX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTAB vs. CAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	1.70%	2.86%	-1.10%
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF	0.18%	6.46%	-1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HTAB and CAFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.58

The correlation between HTAB and CAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HTAB vs. CAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAB

HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 50
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 45

CAFX

CAFX Risk / Return Rank: 35
CAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAB vs. CAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HTAB	CAFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.16	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.77	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.21	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	1.88	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.23	5.20	+2.03

HTAB vs. CAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the CAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAB and CAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HTAB vs. CAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than CAFX's maximum drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAB and CAFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTAB	CAFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-2.63%	-12.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.85%	-1.79%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-1.03%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-0.74%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.64%	+0.27%

Volatility

HTAB vs. CAFX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) has a higher volatility of 0.90% compared to Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) at 0.80%. This indicates that HTAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTAB	CAFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.90%	0.80%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	1.94%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	2.91%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.74%	3.16%	+2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.16%	3.16%	+2.00%

HTAB vs. CAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CAFX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTAB vs. CAFX - Dividend Comparison

HTAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than CAFX's 4.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF	4.01%	3.92%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	3.82%	3.88%	3.57%	3.21%	2.26%	2.18%	1.64%	2.77%	1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTAB and CAFX in my portfolio?

HTAB and CAFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTAB or CAFX?

HTAB has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to CAFX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTAB dropped -14.76% vs CAFX's -2.63%.

Which ETF is better, HTAB or CAFX?

On 1-year performance, HTAB leads with 6.59% vs 3.34% for CAFX. On fees, CAFX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HTAB or CAFX?

Over the 1-year period, HTAB has performed better with a 6.59% return vs 3.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTAB or CAFX?

CAFX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HTAB or CAFX?

CAFX has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 3.82% for HTAB.

What is the main difference between HTAB and CAFX?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Congress. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HTAB and 0.35% for CAFX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HTAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.