PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTA.TO achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than TRI.TO's -36.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HTA.TO has outperformed TRI.TO with an annualized return of 20.56%, while TRI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


HTA.TO

1D
-4.05%
1M
3.64%
YTD
20.47%
6M
20.09%
1Y
35.28%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
20.56%

TRI.TO

1D
5.84%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
-36.69%
6M
-37.07%
1Y
-57.04%
3Y*
-12.33%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF
20.47%12.42%23.53%52.86%-32.21%42.59%30.02%32.53%-0.71%34.20%
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters Corporation
-36.69%-20.40%20.70%22.34%3.77%47.41%14.33%43.93%10.60%-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HTA.TO and TRI.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2015

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between HTA.TO and TRI.TO has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTA.TO
HTA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

TRI.TO
TRI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TRI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TRI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTA.TOTRI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.71

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

-0.91

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

-1.35

+9.18

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the TRI.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTA.TO and TRI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTA.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum TRI.TO drawdown of -63.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTA.TO and TRI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTA.TOTRI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-63.05%

+24.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-63.05%

+48.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.02%

-63.05%

+38.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

-63.05%

+24.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-63.05%

+24.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-60.63%

+55.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-13.35%

+5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

42.14%

-37.62%

Volatility

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) is 10.61%, while Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO) has a volatility of 16.82%. This indicates that HTA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTA.TOTRI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

16.82%

-6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

37.79%

-20.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.09%

42.72%

-22.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

25.19%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

23.08%

+0.15%

Dividends

HTA.TO vs. TRI.TO - Dividend Comparison

HTA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, more than TRI.TO's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF
8.07%8.80%8.11%7.81%9.99%4.27%5.52%6.15%7.61%7.03%8.74%5.29%
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters Corporation
4.75%1.81%1.26%4.51%1.42%1.27%1.86%1.97%11.21%2.82%2.65%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTA.TO and TRI.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTA.TO and TRI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer