HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTA.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF) and QQQY.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HTA.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harvest, while QQQY.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index. HTA.TO is actively managed, while QQQY.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, HTA.TO returned 44.88% vs 52.29% for QQQY.TO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HTA.TO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for QQQY.TO.

Performance

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTA.TO achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY.TO's 20.66% return.

HTA.TO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 16.27%
• YTD: 26.21%
• 6M: 26.86%
• 1Y: 44.88%
• 3Y*: 26.62%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: 20.58%

QQQY.TO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 12.57%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 6M: 19.40%
• 1Y: 52.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF	26.21%	12.42%	23.53%	14.78%
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund	20.66%	24.48%	28.32%	28,271.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HTA.TO and QQQY.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023	0.90

The correlation between HTA.TO and QQQY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HTA.TO	QQQY.TO
Technology	90.1%	79.0%
Communication Services	9.9%	19.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTA.TO

HTA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 67
HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HTA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HTA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HTA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HTA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

QQQY.TO

QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTA.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.81	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.53	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.48	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	3.52	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	13.82	-3.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTA.TO and QQQY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTA.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.81	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.07	+0.67

Drawdowns

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTA.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than QQQY.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTA.TO and QQQY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTA.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.77%	-26.27%	-12.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.87%	-14.91%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-0.14%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-4.03%	-4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	3.79%	+0.57%

Volatility

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) at 4.62%. This indicates that HTA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTA.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	4.62%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.56%	14.65%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.91%	18.74%	-0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.53%	15,024.21%	-15,000.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.08%	15,024.21%	-15,001.13%

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTA.TO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTA.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Dividend Comparison

HTA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, less than QQQY.TO's 12.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF	7.70%	8.80%	8.11%	7.81%	9.99%	4.27%	5.52%	6.12%	7.58%	7.03%	8.74%	5.29%
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund	12.29%	13.97%	14.09%	2.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTA.TO and QQQY.TO in my portfolio?

HTA.TO and QQQY.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTA.TO or QQQY.TO?

On fees, QQQY.TO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTA.TO or QQQY.TO?

QQQY.TO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HTA.TO.

What is the main difference between HTA.TO and QQQY.TO?

HTA.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQY.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HTA.TO and 0.74% for QQQY.TO.