HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

HSXJ.L (HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from HSBC - HSXJ.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while HTWN.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSXJ.L returned 11.61%/yr vs 23.10%/yr for HTWN.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSXJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWN.L.

Performance

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while HTWN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HTWN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSXJ.L achieves a 35.95% return, which is significantly lower than HTWN.L's 68.07% return.

HSXJ.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 35.95%
• 6M: 37.16%
• 1Y: 60.86%
• 3Y*: 26.21%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: —

HTWN.L

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 68.07%
• 6M: 72.32%
• 1Y: 105.22%
• 3Y*: 41.90%
• 5Y*: 23.10%
• 10Y*: 22.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	35.95%	23.28%	16.71%	-1.43%	-5.93%	0.54%	-10.38%
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	68.07%	23.15%	27.50%	21.97%	-21.03%	29.44%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXJ.L and HTWN.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020	0.74

The correlation between HSXJ.L and HTWN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSXJ.L	HTWN.L
Technology	52.2%	83.0%
Financial Services	20.1%	10.1%
Basic Materials	10.1%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	0.9%
Industrials	4.1%	1.7%
Energy	2.2%	-
Healthcare	2.0%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	0.7%
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Utilities	0.8%	-
Communication Services	0.4%	1.3%

Return for Risk

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXJ.L

HSXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
HSXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HSXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HSXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HSXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

HTWN.L

HTWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HTWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HTWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
HTWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HTWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSXJ.L	HTWN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	4.31	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	5.01	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.69	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.54	11.81	-6.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.29	30.73	-12.43

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXJ.L and HTWN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum HTWN.L drawdown of -32.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and HTWN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSXJ.L	HTWN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.60%	-32.63%	+7.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-8.86%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.13%	-29.76%	+5.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.13%	-29.98%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-6.96%	+1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.91%	-7.43%	-3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	3.41%	-0.09%

Volatility

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) is 9.42%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that HSXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSXJ.L	HTWN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.42%	10.84%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.45%	20.32%	-3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.77%	24.31%	-5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.61%	21.13%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	20.36%	+2.52%

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Dividend Comparison

HSXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	0.96%	1.61%	1.17%	2.79%	3.06%	1.11%	1.79%	2.13%	2.56%	2.03%	2.32%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSXJ.L and HTWN.L in my portfolio?

HSXJ.L and HTWN.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSXJ.L or HTWN.L?

On fees, HSXJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSXJ.L or HTWN.L?

HSXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWN.L.

What is the main difference between HSXJ.L and HTWN.L?

HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.50% for HTWN.L.