PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while ESPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESPS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSXJ.L achieves a 34.70% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 6.57% return.


HSXJ.L

1D
-1.85%
1M
11.50%
YTD
34.70%
6M
37.46%
1Y
65.64%
3Y*
24.72%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*

ESPS.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
0.04%
YTD
6.57%
6M
7.12%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HSXJ.L
HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
34.70%23.23%16.70%-1.41%-5.93%-7.09%
ESPS.L
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
6.57%10.52%7.35%2.26%1.34%5.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXJ.L and ESPS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.40

Over the past year, HSXJ.L and ESPS.L have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSXJ.L
ESPS.L

Technology

48.9%
1.4%

Financial Services

21.8%
50.7%

Basic Materials

10.6%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
6.8%

Industrials

4.3%
7.2%

Energy

2.4%
3.0%

Healthcare

2.2%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
7.8%

Utilities

0.8%
2.2%

Communication Services

0.4%
2.6%

Technology

HSXJ.L
48.9%
ESPS.L
1.4%

Financial Services

HSXJ.L
21.8%
ESPS.L
50.7%

Basic Materials

HSXJ.L
10.6%
ESPS.L
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HSXJ.L
6.4%
ESPS.L
6.8%

Industrials

HSXJ.L
4.3%
ESPS.L
7.2%

Energy

HSXJ.L
2.4%
ESPS.L
3.0%

Healthcare

HSXJ.L
2.2%
ESPS.L
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

HSXJ.L
1.3%
ESPS.L
2.6%

Real Estate

HSXJ.L
1.0%
ESPS.L
7.8%

Utilities

HSXJ.L
0.8%
ESPS.L
2.2%

Communication Services

HSXJ.L
0.4%
ESPS.L
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXJ.L
HSXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPS.L
ESPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSXJ.LESPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.24

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.98

1.93

+4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.00

5.53

+15.47

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXJ.L and ESPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSXJ.LESPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

1.34

+2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.59

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.66

+0.18

Drawdowns

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and ESPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSXJ.LESPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-17.76%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-7.52%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-17.76%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

-17.76%

-3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-4.04%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-4.55%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.63%

+0.49%

Volatility

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) at 3.56%. This indicates that HSXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSXJ.LESPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

3.56%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

8.36%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

10.84%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

18.86%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

18.86%

-2.55%

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSXJ.L nor ESPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HSXJ.L and ESPS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HSXJ.L.

HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while ESPS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSXJ.L and ESPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer