PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific Ex Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSXD.L) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSXD.L is traded in USD, while HSTC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSXD.L achieves a 27.12% return, which is significantly higher than HSTC.L's -13.41% return.


HSXD.L

1D
-1.47%
1M
-7.17%
6M
21.56%
YTD
27.12%
1Y
45.66%
3Y*
23.98%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*

HSTC.L

1D
2.59%
1M
0.70%
6M
-18.28%
YTD
-13.41%
1Y
-10.91%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
-8.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSXD.L
HSBC Asia Pacific Ex Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF
27.12%32.35%14.83%4.23%-15.92%-0.71%4.23%
HSTC.L
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF
-13.41%24.93%19.30%-8.73%-28.01%-32.60%-89.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXD.L and HSTC.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.71

The correlation between HSXD.L and HSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXD.L
HSXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HSXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HSXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HSTC.L
HSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific Ex Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSXD.L) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSXD.LHSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.96

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

-0.31

+3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

-0.55

+11.40

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the HSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXD.L and HSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.23%, smaller than the maximum HSTC.L drawdown of -96.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXD.L and HSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSXD.LHSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.23%

-96.76%

+58.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-35.56%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-35.56%

+15.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-63.69%

+30.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.93%

-94.26%

+84.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.15%

-93.72%

+79.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

19.92%

-15.76%

Volatility

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Asia Pacific Ex Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSXD.L) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) at 8.34%. This indicates that HSXD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSXD.LHSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

8.34%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.15%

20.89%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.21%

27.86%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

39.81%

-20.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

54.64%

-35.49%

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HSTC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSXD.L vs. HSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSXD.L nor HSTC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HSXD.L and HSTC.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HSTC.L.

HSXD.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HSTC.L is Technology Equities. HSXD.L tracks HSBC Asia Pacific Ex Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF, while HSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXD.L and 0.50% for HSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSXD.L and HSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer