HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L
HSUS.L (HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and HMWD.L (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while HMWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSUS.L returned 14.02%/yr vs 13.11%/yr for HMWD.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSUS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HMWD.L.
Performance
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSUS.L is traded in GBP, while HMWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSUS.L achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than HMWD.L's 10.19% return.
HSUS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 35.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- —
HMWD.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 13.96% | 10.79% | 21.83% | 15.09% | -7.73% | 29.76% | 11.33% |
HMWD.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.19% | 12.43% | 21.21% | 18.40% | -8.52% | 23.57% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSUS.L and HMWD.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between HSUS.L and HMWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Financial Services
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Healthcare
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Communication Services
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Basic Materials
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Industrials
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Energy
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Consumer Defensive
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Real Estate
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Utilities
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSUS.L
HMWD.L
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSUS.L | HMWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.44 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.33 | 4.23 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.41 | 15.89 | +6.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSUS.L | HMWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45 | 2.35 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.91 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.83 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.92%, smaller than the maximum HMWD.L drawdown of -26.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUS.L and HMWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSUS.L | HMWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -26.10% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.63% | -6.47% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.92% | -18.90% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -18.90% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -3.49% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.72% | -0.13% |
Volatility
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) is 2.97%, while HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that HSUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSUS.L | HMWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.54% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 8.90% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 11.67% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 14.42% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 15.50% | -1.29% |
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HMWD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSUS.L vs. HMWD.L - Dividend Comparison
HSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMWD.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.79% | 1.31% | 1.44% | 1.91% | 2.23% | 1.81% | 2.00% | 1.93% |
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSUS.L and HMWD.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HMWD.L.
HSUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HMWD.L is Global Equities. HSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while HMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUS.L and 0.15% for HMWD.L.
Find the right allocation for HSUS.L and HMWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer