HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L
HSUK.L (HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP) and HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HWWA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSUK.L returned 6.94%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for HWWA.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSUK.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HWWA.L.
Performance
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSUK.L achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than HWWA.L's 13.69% return.
HSUK.L
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
HWWA.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 34.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSUK.L HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP | 0.34% | 25.60% | 10.73% | 2.55% | -6.10% | 17.82% | 6.12% |
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 13.69% | 16.74% | 17.83% | 15.71% | -7.83% | 21.70% | 5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSUK.L and HWWA.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between HSUK.L and HWWA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Consumer Defensive
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Communication Services
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Healthcare
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Industrials
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Basic Materials
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Utilities
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Real Estate
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Technology
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Energy
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSUK.L
HWWA.L
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSUK.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.64 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 5.06 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 21.35 | -18.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSUK.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 3.34 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.02 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSUK.L drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum HWWA.L drawdown of -25.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUK.L and HWWA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSUK.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -25.12% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -6.74% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -16.79% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.87% | -16.79% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.17% | -0.35% | -4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.53% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 1.60% | +2.24% |
Volatility
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that HSUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWWA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSUK.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 3.48% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 7.85% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 10.23% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 12.69% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 14.32% | -0.11% |
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSUK.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HWWA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSUK.L vs. HWWA.L - Dividend Comparison
HSUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSUK.L HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 2.07% | 2.10% | 1.86% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSUK.L and HWWA.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSUK.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSUK.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWA.L.
HSUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HWWA.L is Global Equities. HSUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUK.L and 0.25% for HWWA.L.
Find the right allocation for HSUK.L and HWWA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer