PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSTE.L is traded in USD, while XFSN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XFSN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSTE.L achieves a -10.40% return, which is significantly lower than XFSN.L's -3.14% return.


HSTE.L

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.94%
YTD
-10.40%
6M
-11.48%
1Y
-4.91%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
-9.33%
10Y*

XFSN.L

1D
0.64%
1M
4.70%
YTD
-3.14%
6M
-4.09%
1Y
-2.44%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HSTE.L
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF
-10.40%24.57%19.70%-8.44%-9.30%
XFSN.L
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-3.14%10.70%32.64%27.77%-6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between HSTE.L and XFSN.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022

0.61

The correlation between HSTE.L and XFSN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSTE.L
HSTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HSTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XFSN.L
XFSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSTE.LXFSN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.99

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

-0.10

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

-0.22

-0.08

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSTE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is comparable to the XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSTE.L and XFSN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSTE.LXFSN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

-0.15

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.73

-0.94

Drawdowns

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSTE.L drawdown since its inception was -74.82%, which is greater than XFSN.L's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTE.L and XFSN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSTE.LXFSN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.82%

-24.74%

-50.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-24.74%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-24.74%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.93%

-11.37%

-42.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.77%

-6.01%

-46.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.59%

11.19%

+5.40%

Volatility

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) at 4.32%. This indicates that HSTE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSTE.LXFSN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.94%

4.32%

+6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.11%

12.43%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.47%

16.34%

+11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.38%

20.25%

+19.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.03%

20.25%

+18.78%

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSTE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XFSN.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSTE.L nor XFSN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HSTE.L and XFSN.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFSN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFSN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HSTE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HSTE.L and 0.35% for XFSN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSTE.L and XFSN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer