HSRT vs. TRPA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds from Hartford. HSRT is passively managed, while TRPA is actively managed. Both charge a 0.24% expense ratio.

Performance

HSRT vs. TRPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HSRT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRPA

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSRT vs. TRPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	1.90%	4.84%

Return for Risk

HSRT vs. TRPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRPA

TRPA Risk / Return Rank: 84
TRPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TRPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TRPA Omega Ratio Rank: 78
TRPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TRPA Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSRT vs. TRPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSRT	TRPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	2.55	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HSRT	TRPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.61%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.05%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.10%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HSRT	TRPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.34%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	2.38%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	2.38%	—

HSRT vs. TRPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HSRT and TRPA have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSRT vs. TRPA - Dividend Comparison

HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	1.29%	6.37%	3.98%	2.67%	2.23%	2.88%	3.50%	1.62%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	5.19%	4.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, HSRT or TRPA?

Both ETFs have the same 0.24% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSRT or TRPA?

HSRT and TRPA have the same expense ratio: 0.24% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSRT or TRPA?

TRPA has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.