HSRT vs. CLOC
HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. HSRT is passively managed, while CLOC is actively managed. HSRT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CLOC.
Performance
HSRT vs. CLOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSRT vs. CLOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 2.34% | 0.93% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSRT vs. CLOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSRT | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 6.09 | — |
Drawdowns
HSRT vs. CLOC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSRT | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.07% | — |
Volatility
HSRT vs. CLOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSRT | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.91% | — |
HSRT vs. CLOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSRT vs. CLOC - Dividend Comparison
HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 3.67% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CLOC.
CLOC has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and AAM. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.49% for CLOC.
Find the right allocation for HSRT and CLOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer