HSRT vs. ACLO
HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. HSRT is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSRT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.
Performance
HSRT vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSRT vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 0.86% |
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 5.32% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSRT and ACLO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSRT vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank
HSRT
ACLO
HSRT vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSRT | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 5.10 | — |
Drawdowns
HSRT vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSRT | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.05% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
HSRT vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSRT | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.73% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 1.08% | — |
HSRT vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSRT vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison
HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSRT and ACLO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HSRT.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.20% for ACLO.
Find the right allocation for HSRT and ACLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer