HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L
HSPX.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and HSXJ.L (HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while HSXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSPX.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for HSXJ.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HSXJ.L.
Performance
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSPX.L is traded in GBp, while HSXJ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSXJ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSPX.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than HSXJ.L's 34.70% return.
HSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
HSXJ.L
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 11.50%
- YTD
- 34.70%
- 6M
- 37.46%
- 1Y
- 65.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- —
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.50% | 9.36% | 27.32% | 19.94% | -9.10% | 30.95% | 6.19% |
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 34.70% | 23.23% | 16.70% | -1.41% | -5.93% | 0.54% | 16.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPX.L and HSXJ.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HSPX.L and HSXJ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Financial Services
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Communication Services
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Healthcare
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Industrials
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Consumer Defensive
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Energy
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Utilities
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Real Estate
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Basic Materials
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSPX.L
HSXJ.L
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSPX.L | HSXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.69 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 5.98 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.81 | 21.00 | -6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSPX.L | HSXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 3.83 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.71 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.84 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, roughly equal to the maximum HSXJ.L drawdown of -25.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPX.L and HSXJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSPX.L | HSXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -25.60% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -10.93% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.76% | -18.39% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | -21.07% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -2.88% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -9.52% | +6.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.12% | -1.16% |
Volatility
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) is 2.66%, while HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that HSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSPX.L | HSXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 8.04% | -5.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.23% | 14.25% | -7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.65% | 17.08% | -6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 16.37% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 16.31% | -0.84% |
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HSXJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSPX.L vs. HSXJ.L - Dividend Comparison
HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while HSXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 0.95% | 1.41% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.61% |
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSPX.L and HSXJ.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HSXJ.L.
HSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while HSXJ.L is Asia Pacific Equities. HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPX.L and 0.25% for HSXJ.L.
Find the right allocation for HSPX.L and HSXJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer