PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSWO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSPX.L is traded in GBp, while HSWO.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSWO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPX.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than HSWO.L's 13.42% return.


HSPX.L

1D
0.01%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.42%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
16.09%

HSWO.L

1D
0.31%
1M
7.82%
YTD
13.42%
6M
15.23%
1Y
32.41%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.50%9.36%27.32%19.94%-9.10%30.95%11.05%
HSWO.L
HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
13.42%15.31%16.91%13.60%-7.08%23.82%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPX.L and HSWO.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020

0.92

The correlation between HSPX.L and HSWO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSPX.L
HSWO.L

Technology

38.0%
30.6%

Financial Services

11.3%
26.8%

Communication Services

10.8%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
7.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
11.2%

Industrials

7.8%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.6%

Energy

3.4%
1.0%

Utilities

2.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.9%

Technology

HSPX.L
38.0%
HSWO.L
30.6%

Financial Services

HSPX.L
11.3%
HSWO.L
26.8%

Communication Services

HSPX.L
10.8%
HSWO.L
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HSPX.L
9.9%
HSWO.L
7.0%

Healthcare

HSPX.L
8.4%
HSWO.L
11.2%

Industrials

HSPX.L
7.8%
HSWO.L
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

HSPX.L
4.7%
HSWO.L
5.6%

Energy

HSPX.L
3.4%
HSWO.L
1.0%

Utilities

HSPX.L
2.2%
HSWO.L
2.3%

Real Estate

HSPX.L
1.9%
HSWO.L
0.6%

Basic Materials

HSPX.L
1.7%
HSWO.L
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPX.L
HSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HSWO.L
HSWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HSWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HSWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSPX.LHSWO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.63

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

4.72

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.81

19.29

-4.48

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the HSWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPX.L and HSWO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSPX.LHSWO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

3.30

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

1.04

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.18

-0.21

Drawdowns

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than HSWO.L's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPX.L and HSWO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPX.LHSWO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-17.26%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-6.84%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.76%

-17.26%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-17.26%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-2.70%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.68%

+0.28%

Volatility

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSWO.L) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPX.LHSWO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.73%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.23%

7.41%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

9.76%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

12.47%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

12.74%

+2.73%

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HSWO.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSPX.L vs. HSWO.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while HSWO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.82%0.93%0.98%1.19%1.27%0.95%1.41%1.47%1.60%1.54%1.49%1.61%
HSWO.L
HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSPX.L and HSWO.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSWO.L.

HSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while HSWO.L is Global Equities. HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while HSWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPX.L and 0.18% for HSWO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPX.L and HSWO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer