HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HSPX.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and HSJP.L (HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while HSJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSPX.L returned 13.52%/yr vs 11.19%/yr for HSJP.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSJP.L.

Performance

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HSPX.L is traded in GBp, while HSJP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSJP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPX.L achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than HSJP.L's 13.58% return.

HSPX.L

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: 9.63%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: 14.71%

HSJP.L

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 7.29%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 1Y: 34.61%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF	10.04%	9.36%	27.32%	19.94%	-9.10%	30.95%	11.61%
HSJP.L HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	13.58%	18.26%	13.86%	13.29%	-5.31%	4.55%	-10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPX.L and HSJP.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.51

The correlation between HSPX.L and HSJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSPX.L	HSJP.L
Technology	37.9%	19.5%
Financial Services	11.7%	20.8%
Communication Services	10.0%	9.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	17.3%
Healthcare	9.1%	5.5%
Industrials	8.4%	19.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.3%
Energy	3.0%	0.1%
Utilities	2.3%	0.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.0%

Return for Risk

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPX.L

HSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

HSJP.L

HSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
HSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
HSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSPX.L	HSJP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.80	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.44	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	2.84	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	8.46	+1.89

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPX.L and HSJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -44.77%, which is greater than HSJP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPX.L and HSJP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSPX.L	HSJP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.77%	-25.60%	-19.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-12.12%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.76%	-20.24%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.76%	-20.24%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-2.57%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	-8.89%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	4.08%	-2.07%

Volatility

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) is 2.91%, while HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that HSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSPX.L	HSJP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	5.39%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	15.61%	-7.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	19.20%	-8.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.30%	21.29%	-6.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.35%	22.13%	-6.78%

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HSJP.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSPX.L vs. HSJP.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while HSJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSJP.L HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF	0.83%	0.94%	0.98%	1.19%	1.27%	0.95%	1.41%	1.47%	1.60%	1.54%	1.49%	1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSPX.L and HSJP.L in my portfolio?

HSPX.L and HSJP.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSPX.L or HSJP.L?

On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSPX.L or HSJP.L?

HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSJP.L.

What is the main difference between HSPX.L and HSJP.L?

HSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while HSJP.L is Japan Equities. HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPX.L and 0.18% for HSJP.L.