HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L
HSPX.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and HMEU.L (HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while HMEU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HSPX.L returned 14.71%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for HMEU.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HMEU.L.
Performance
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSPX.L achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than HMEU.L's 7.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPX.L has outperformed HMEU.L with an annualized return of 14.71%, while HMEU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.
HSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
HMEU.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.04% | 9.36% | 27.32% | 19.94% | -9.10% | 30.95% | 13.89% | 26.37% | 0.09% | 10.81% |
HMEU.L HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF | 7.42% | 25.88% | 3.54% | 13.28% | -3.35% | 17.08% | 2.26% | 19.75% | -9.42% | 14.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPX.L and HMEU.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010 | 0.71 |
The correlation between HSPX.L and HMEU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Financial Services
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Communication Services
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Healthcare
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Industrials
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Consumer Defensive
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Energy
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Utilities
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Real Estate
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Basic Materials
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSPX.L
HMEU.L
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSPX.L | HMEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 1.70 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 6.03 | +4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -44.77%, which is greater than HMEU.L's maximum drawdown of -29.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPX.L and HMEU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSPX.L | HMEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.77% | -29.95% | -14.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -10.42% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.76% | -12.77% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | -15.46% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | -28.42% | +2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -2.51% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -6.04% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.95% | -0.94% |
Volatility
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) is 2.91%, while HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that HSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSPX.L | HMEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.39% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 10.67% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 12.44% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 13.80% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 14.72% | +0.63% |
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HMEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSPX.L vs. HMEU.L - Dividend Comparison
HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than HMEU.L's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEU.L HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF | 1.83% | 2.55% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.16% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.29% | 2.77% | 2.81% | 2.62% |
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.83% | 0.94% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 0.95% | 1.41% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSPX.L and HMEU.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HMEU.L.
HSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while HMEU.L is Europe Equities. HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while HMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPX.L and 0.25% for HMEU.L.
Find the right allocation for HSPX.L and HMEU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer