HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HSPX.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both S&P 500 funds - HSPX.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while 5ESG.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSPX.L returned 13.52%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for 5ESG.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.

Performance

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPX.L achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 9.11% return.

HSPX.L

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: 9.63%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: 14.71%

5ESG.L

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: 8.84%
• YTD: 9.11%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 12.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF	10.04%	9.36%	27.32%	19.94%	-9.10%	30.95%	13.89%	16.06%
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist	9.11%	18.26%	23.62%	26.17%	-20.24%	31.59%	15.83%	16.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPX.L and 5ESG.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019	0.80

The correlation between HSPX.L and 5ESG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSPX.L	5ESG.L
Technology	37.9%	38.0%
Financial Services	11.7%	12.3%
Communication Services	10.0%	12.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	5.0%
Healthcare	9.1%	10.6%
Industrials	8.4%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	5.1%
Energy	3.0%	2.7%
Utilities	2.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.0%

Return for Risk

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPX.L

HSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

5ESG.L

5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSPX.L	5ESG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.92	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.91	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	2.54	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	10.84	-0.49

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPX.L and 5ESG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -44.77%, which is greater than 5ESG.L's maximum drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPX.L and 5ESG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSPX.L	5ESG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.77%	-36.07%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-9.01%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.76%	-19.53%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.76%	-25.41%	+4.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.96%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	-5.34%	-3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.12%	-0.11%

Volatility

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that HSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSPX.L	5ESG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.77%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	9.38%	-1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	11.94%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.30%	16.24%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.35%	18.00%	-2.65%

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSPX.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist	0.62%	0.87%	0.47%	1.07%	1.32%	0.89%	1.25%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF	0.83%	0.94%	0.98%	1.19%	1.27%	0.95%	1.41%	1.47%	1.60%	1.54%	1.49%	1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSPX.L and 5ESG.L in my portfolio?

HSPX.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSPX.L or 5ESG.L?

On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSPX.L or 5ESG.L?

HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

What is the main difference between HSPX.L and 5ESG.L?

HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPX.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.