HSMV vs. IWC
HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) and IWC (iShares Micro-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. HSMV is actively managed, while IWC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSMV returned 3.79%/yr vs 5.88%/yr for IWC. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IWC.
Performance
HSMV vs. IWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than IWC's 21.41% return.
HSMV
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- —
IWC
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 21.41%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- 1Y
- 58.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
HSMV vs. IWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 3.62% | 1.57% | 13.17% | 5.01% | -9.44% | 23.72% | 34.70% |
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 21.41% | 22.45% | 13.63% | 8.99% | -21.93% | 18.67% | 83.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSMV and IWC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HSMV and IWC has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HSMV vs. IWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSMV
IWC
Real Estate
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
HSMV
IWC
Financial Services
HSMV
IWC
Industrials
HSMV
IWC
Utilities
HSMV
IWC
Consumer Defensive
HSMV
IWC
Consumer Cyclical
HSMV
IWC
Basic Materials
HSMV
IWC
Healthcare
HSMV
IWC
Energy
HSMV
IWC
Communication Services
HSMV
IWC
Technology
HSMV
IWC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSMV vs. IWC — Risk / Return Rank
HSMV
IWC
HSMV vs. IWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSMV | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 4.69 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 15.50 | -13.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSMV | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.47 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.24 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.32 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
HSMV vs. IWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum IWC drawdown of -64.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and IWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSMV | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -64.61% | +45.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -12.43% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -29.46% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -40.68% | +21.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -0.91% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -15.27% | +9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.75% | -1.15% |
Volatility
HSMV vs. IWC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) is 2.83%, while iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that HSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSMV | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 7.26% | -4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 17.35% | -10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 23.63% | -13.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 24.44% | -9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 24.42% | -8.37% |
HSMV vs. IWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IWC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSMV vs. IWC - Dividend Comparison
HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than IWC's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 1.99% | 2.01% | 1.43% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 0.76% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 0.89% | 1.10% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSMV and IWC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWC has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to HSMV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSMV dropped -19.16% vs IWC's -64.61%.
On 5-year performance, IWC leads with 5.88% vs 3.79% for HSMV. On fees, IWC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWC has performed better with a 5.88% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.
HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.89% for IWC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.60% for IWC.
IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSMV and IWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer