HSMV vs. ASCE

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

HSMV vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 28.68% return.

HSMV

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 7.76%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 4.65%
• 10Y*: —

ASCE

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 6.65%
• YTD: 28.68%
• 6M: 23.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSMV vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF	7.42%	0.18%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	28.68%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HSMV and ASCE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

HSMV vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSMV

HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 22
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 20
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 25

ASCE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSMV vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSMV	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.95	—	—

Drawdowns

HSMV vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSMV	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-9.22%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-1.98%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.58%	-2.01%	-3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HSMV	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.58%	19.73%	-9.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.00%	19.73%	-4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	19.73%	-3.70%

HSMV vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSMV vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF	1.92%	2.01%	1.43%	1.43%	1.26%	0.76%	0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSMV and ASCE in my portfolio?

HSMV and ASCE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSMV or ASCE?

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSMV or ASCE?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSMV or ASCE?

HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between HSMV and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.38% for ASCE.