HSMV vs. ASCE
HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.
Performance
HSMV vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.
HSMV
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ASCE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 22.25%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSMV vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 3.11% | 0.20% |
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 22.25% | 8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSMV and ASCE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSMV vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank
HSMV
ASCE
HSMV vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSMV | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSMV | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.92 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
HSMV vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and ASCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSMV | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -9.22% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -0.38% | -3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -2.10% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility
HSMV vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSMV | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 19.25% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 19.25% | -4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 19.25% | -3.19% |
HSMV vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSMV vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison
HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.18% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.43% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 0.76% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSMV and ASCE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.
HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.38% for ASCE.
Find the right allocation for HSMV and ASCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer