HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HSJP.L (HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and HNSS.L (HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while HNSS.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HSJP.L returned 16.72%/yr vs 58.47%/yr for HNSS.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSJP.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HNSS.L.

Performance

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSJP.L achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly lower than HNSS.L's 91.77% return.

HSJP.L

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 8.19%
• YTD: 13.21%
• 6M: 13.27%
• 1Y: 30.10%
• 3Y*: 16.72%
• 5Y*: 11.11%
• 10Y*: —

HNSS.L

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: 21.88%
• YTD: 91.77%
• 6M: 93.25%
• 1Y: 194.16%
• 3Y*: 58.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HSJP.L HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	13.21%	18.24%	13.93%	13.26%	-2.20%
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF	91.77%	45.50%	19.96%	60.90%	-19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HSJP.L and HNSS.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022	0.45

Return for Risk

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSJP.L

HSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
HSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
HSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
HSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
HSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

HNSS.L

HNSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HNSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HNSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
HNSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HNSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSJP.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	6.08	-4.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	6.01	-3.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.78	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	14.66	-12.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	50.30	-42.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSJP.L and HNSS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSJP.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	6.08	-4.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	1.34	-0.59

Drawdowns

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.22%, smaller than the maximum HNSS.L drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSJP.L and HNSS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSJP.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.22%	-36.83%	+20.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.15%	-13.16%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.09%	-36.83%	+23.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-2.66%	+2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-9.55%	+4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	3.84%	+0.24%

Volatility

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) is 3.87%, while HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that HSJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSJP.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	13.36%	-9.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.21%	24.62%	-9.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.66%	31.72%	-13.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.01%	30.12%	-14.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	30.12%	-14.20%

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HNSS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSJP.L vs. HNSS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSJP.L nor HNSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSJP.L and HNSS.L in my portfolio?

HSJP.L and HNSS.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSJP.L or HNSS.L?

On fees, HSJP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSJP.L or HNSS.L?

HSJP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HNSS.L.

What is the main difference between HSJP.L and HNSS.L?

HSJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HNSS.L is Semiconductors. HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while HNSS.L tracks Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSJP.L and 0.35% for HNSS.L.