HSHP vs. PAC
HSHP (Himalaya Shipping Ltd.) and PAC (Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — HSHP in Marine Shipping, PAC in Airports & Air Services. Over the past 3 years, HSHP returned 44.60%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for PAC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HSHP vs. PAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSHP achieves a 71.21% return, which is significantly higher than PAC's -10.14% return.
HSHP
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 71.21%
- 6M
- 71.96%
- 1Y
- 144.70%
- 3Y*
- 44.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAC
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -10.14%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
HSHP vs. PAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd. | 71.21% | 96.10% | -23.53% | 37.12% | -1.99% |
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | -10.14% | 56.30% | 4.19% | 28.64% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSHP and PAC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
HSHP:
$715.11M
PAC:
$11.97B
HSHP:
$0.63
PAC:
MX$214.01
HSHP:
24.25
PAC:
19.09
HSHP:
0.04
PAC:
1.16
HSHP:
4.92
PAC:
6.29
HSHP:
4.59
PAC:
8.03
HSHP:
$143.50M
PAC:
MX$32.84B
HSHP:
$98.40M
PAC:
MX$10.93B
HSHP:
$101.44M
PAC:
MX$20.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSHP vs. PAC — Risk / Return Rank
HSHP
PAC
HSHP vs. PAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSHP | PAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.04 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.35 | 0.13 | +9.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.19 | 0.27 | +20.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSHP vs. PAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSHP drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, smaller than the maximum PAC drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSHP and PAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSHP | PAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.51% | -73.20% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -26.19% | +10.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.51% | -42.83% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -21.14% | +15.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -16.52% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 12.29% | -5.44% |
Volatility
HSHP vs. PAC - Volatility Comparison
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) at 10.37%. This indicates that HSHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSHP | PAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 10.37% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.50% | 25.96% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.51% | 31.04% | +8.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 36.11% | +6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 38.51% | +4.00% |
Dividends
HSHP vs. PAC - Dividend Comparison
HSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than PAC's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd. | 3.81% | 3.57% | 9.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | 1.89% | 3.33% | 4.14% | 4.88% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 6.27% | 5.83% | 4.50% | 3.98% |
Financials
HSHP vs. PAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HSHP vs. PAC - Profitability Comparison
HSHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a gross profit of 18.40M and revenue of 33.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.8%.
PAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 6.29B and revenue of 11.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
HSHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.2%.
PAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 5.04B and revenue of 11.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.4%.
HSHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
PAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 3.31B and revenue of 11.37B, resulting in a net margin of 29.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HSHP and PAC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSHP has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to PAC (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSHP dropped -51.51% vs PAC's -73.20%.
HSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSHP and PAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer