HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO
HSH.TO (Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF) and XUS.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF) are both S&P 500 funds. HSH.TO is actively managed, while XUS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSH.TO returned 11.71%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for XUS.TO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSH.TO achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than XUS.TO's 13.69% return.
HSH.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XUS.TO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSH.TO Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.63% | 15.34% | 23.32% | 25.56% | -19.90% | 28.94% | 16.14% | 17.33% |
XUS.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 13.69% | 12.19% | 35.81% | 24.87% | -11.33% | 28.81% | 17.22% | 18.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSH.TO and XUS.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between HSH.TO and XUS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HSH.TO
XUS.TO
HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSH.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.94 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 10.95 | -2.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, which is greater than XUS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSH.TO and XUS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSH.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -27.24% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -8.63% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -18.96% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -21.29% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.83% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.23% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.31% | -0.08% |
Volatility
HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) at 3.13%. This indicates that HSH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSH.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.13% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 9.58% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 12.23% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 15.11% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 16.53% | +3.58% |
Dividends
HSH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Dividend Comparison
HSH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSH.TO Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUS.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 1.12% | 1.26% | 1.45% | 2.43% | 2.76% | 1.99% | 2.70% | 4.05% | 3.55% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 3.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSH.TO and XUS.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.
Find the right allocation for HSH.TO and XUS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer