PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSGFX vs. WTLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HSGFX vs. WTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and WisdomTree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund (WTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HSGFX vs. WTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


HSGFX

1D
-0.17%
1M
5.24%
YTD
5.80%
6M
2.66%
1Y
0.49%
3Y*
-1.32%
5Y*
-0.64%
10Y*
-1.69%

WTLS

1D
3.22%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HSGFX vs. WTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSGFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than WTLS's 0.88% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HSGFX vs. WTLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSGFX
HSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
HSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

WTLS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSGFX vs. WTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and WisdomTree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund (WTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSGFXWTLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.22

HSGFX vs. WTLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSGFXWTLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

-0.61

+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between HSGFX and WTLS is -0.58. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HSGFX vs. WTLS - Dividend Comparison

HSGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while WTLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSGFX
Hussman Strategic Growth Fund
2.20%2.33%3.00%3.10%1.08%0.42%0.16%1.84%1.19%0.50%0.28%0.56%
WTLS
WisdomTree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HSGFX vs. WTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than WTLS's maximum drawdown of -8.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSGFX and WTLS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HSGFXWTLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-8.94%

-51.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.60%

-6.01%

-43.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-2.84%

-23.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.35%

Volatility

HSGFX vs. WTLS - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HSGFXWTLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

19.88%

-7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

19.88%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

19.88%

-9.29%