HSGFX vs. VMNIX
HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) and VMNIX (Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX returned -2.55%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for VMNIX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSGFX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for VMNIX.
Performance
HSGFX vs. VMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSGFX achieves a -8.08% return, which is significantly lower than VMNIX's 15.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX has underperformed VMNIX with an annualized return of -2.55%, while VMNIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.49% annualized return.
HSGFX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -8.08%
- 1Y
- -13.96%
- 3Y*
- -3.67%
- 5Y*
- -2.68%
- 10Y*
- -2.55%
VMNIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.49%
HSGFX vs. VMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | -8.08% | 6.24% | -6.99% | -11.60% | 17.33% | -0.23% | 14.52% | -18.87% | 8.78% | -12.72% |
VMNIX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | 15.97% | 9.36% | 5.84% | 12.33% | 13.47% | 23.39% | -11.58% | -9.48% | 0.66% | -4.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSGFX and VMNIX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2000 | 0.07 |
The correlation between HSGFX and VMNIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (3 years) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSGFX vs. VMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
HSGFX
VMNIX
HSGFX vs. VMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSGFX | VMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.59 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 5.31 | -6.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 17.03 | -18.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSGFX vs. VMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than VMNIX's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSGFX and VMNIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSGFX | VMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.61% | -27.90% | -32.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -4.65% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.52% | -5.36% | -19.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -6.69% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.86% | -24.95% | -5.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.21% | 0.00% | -56.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.98% | -8.73% | -18.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.87% | 1.45% | +7.42% |
Volatility
HSGFX vs. VMNIX - Volatility Comparison
Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX) at 2.42%. This indicates that HSGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSGFX | VMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 2.42% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 5.72% | +4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 7.86% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 7.25% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 6.45% | +4.41% |
HSGFX vs. VMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSGFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VMNIX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSGFX vs. VMNIX - Dividend Comparison
HSGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than VMNIX's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | 2.53% | 2.33% | 3.00% | 3.10% | 1.08% | 0.42% | 0.16% | 1.84% | 1.19% | 0.50% | 0.28% | 0.56% |
VMNIX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | 3.08% | 3.59% | 5.67% | 5.15% | 0.78% | 0.20% | 0.86% | 3.23% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 0.45% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSGFX and VMNIX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSGFX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to VMNIX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSGFX dropped -60.61% vs VMNIX's -27.90%.
VMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSGFX and VMNIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer