HSGFX vs. VMNFX
HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) and VMNFX (Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX returned -2.22%/yr vs 5.42%/yr for VMNFX. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HSGFX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for VMNFX.
Performance
HSGFX vs. VMNFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSGFX achieves a -5.27% return, which is significantly lower than VMNFX's 16.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX has underperformed VMNFX with an annualized return of -2.22%, while VMNFX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.42% annualized return.
HSGFX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- 6M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- -5.27%
- 1Y
- -10.47%
- 3Y*
- -2.65%
- 5Y*
- -1.91%
- 10Y*
- -2.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.22%
VMNFX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- YTD
- 16.18%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 5.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
HSGFX vs. VMNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | -5.27% | 6.24% | -6.99% | -11.60% | 17.33% | -0.23% | 14.52% | -18.87% | 8.78% | -12.72% |
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares | 16.18% | 9.27% | 5.78% | 12.23% | 13.48% | 23.24% | -11.58% | -9.57% | 0.60% | -4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSGFX and VMNFX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2000 | 0.07 |
The correlation between HSGFX and VMNFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (3 years) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSGFX vs. VMNFX — Risk / Return Rank
HSGFX
VMNFX
HSGFX vs. VMNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSGFX | VMNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.62 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 5.37 | -5.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 17.69 | -18.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSGFX vs. VMNFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than VMNFX's maximum drawdown of -26.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSGFX and VMNFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSGFX | VMNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.61% | -26.42% | -34.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -4.65% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.52% | -5.44% | -19.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -6.75% | -17.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.86% | -25.09% | -5.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.87% | -0.43% | -54.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -8.71% | -18.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.44% | 1.41% | +8.03% |
Volatility
HSGFX vs. VMNFX - Volatility Comparison
Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) at 1.85%. This indicates that HSGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSGFX | VMNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 1.85% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 5.32% | +5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 7.71% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 7.24% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 6.43% | +4.47% |
HSGFX vs. VMNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSGFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VMNFX's 1.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSGFX vs. VMNFX - Dividend Comparison
HSGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than VMNFX's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | 2.46% | 2.33% | 3.00% | 3.10% | 1.08% | 0.42% | 0.16% | 1.84% | 1.19% | 0.50% | 0.28% | 0.56% |
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares | 3.02% | 3.53% | 5.61% | 5.09% | 0.75% | 0.16% | 0.81% | 3.16% | 0.94% | 1.07% | 0.38% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSGFX and VMNFX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSGFX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to VMNFX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSGFX dropped -60.61% vs VMNFX's -26.42%.
VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSGFX and VMNFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer