PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSEF.L is traded in GBP, while JRDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSEF.L achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than JRDM.L's 29.14% return.


HSEF.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.00%
YTD
15.11%
6M
15.45%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*

JRDM.L

1D
-1.53%
1M
6.69%
YTD
29.14%
6M
31.37%
1Y
59.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HSEF.L and JRDM.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.56

Over the past year, HSEF.L and JRDM.L have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSEF.L
JRDM.L

Technology

40.2%
37.5%

Financial Services

21.2%
20.3%

Basic Materials

9.3%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.7%

Industrials

4.8%
6.8%

Energy

4.2%
4.5%

Healthcare

4.0%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
7.3%

Utilities

1.1%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.4%

Technology

HSEF.L
40.2%
JRDM.L
37.5%

Financial Services

HSEF.L
21.2%
JRDM.L
20.3%

Basic Materials

HSEF.L
9.3%
JRDM.L
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HSEF.L
9.2%
JRDM.L
10.7%

Industrials

HSEF.L
4.8%
JRDM.L
6.8%

Energy

HSEF.L
4.2%
JRDM.L
4.5%

Healthcare

HSEF.L
4.0%
JRDM.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

HSEF.L
2.9%
JRDM.L
2.5%

Communication Services

HSEF.L
2.7%
JRDM.L
7.3%

Utilities

HSEF.L
1.1%
JRDM.L
1.6%

Real Estate

HSEF.L
0.6%
JRDM.L
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSEF.L
HSEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HSEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDM.L
JRDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSEF.LJRDM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.70

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

6.35

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

21.50

-8.21

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSEF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is lower than the JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSEF.L and JRDM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSEF.LJRDM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.84

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

2.20

-1.61

Drawdowns

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSEF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, which is greater than JRDM.L's maximum drawdown of -14.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSEF.L and JRDM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSEF.LJRDM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.33%

-14.88%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-10.47%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-2.35%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-2.43%

-6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.99%

-0.12%

Volatility

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) is 5.49%, while JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that HSEF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSEF.LJRDM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

7.59%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

14.42%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

17.35%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

19.73%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

19.73%

-4.02%

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSEF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDM.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSEF.L vs. JRDM.L - Dividend Comparison

HSEF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HSEF.L and JRDM.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSEF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSEF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JRDM.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSEF.L and 0.30% for JRDM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSEF.L and JRDM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer