HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L
HSEF.L (HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and HPRO.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSEF.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while HPRO.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSEF.L returned 7.39%/yr vs -0.95%/yr for HPRO.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSEF.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRO.L.
Performance
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSEF.L is traded in GBP, while HPRO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HPRO.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSEF.L achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than HPRO.L's 5.06% return.
HSEF.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 38.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
HPRO.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.11%
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSEF.L HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 15.11% | 20.85% | 17.02% | -1.33% | -8.36% | 1.82% | 11.41% |
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 5.06% | 0.35% | -1.94% | 1.11% | -18.31% | 24.70% | 5.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSEF.L and HPRO.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2020 | 0.35 |
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
Financial Services
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
Basic Materials
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
Industrials
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
-
Energy
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
-
Healthcare
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
-
Consumer Defensive
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
-
Communication Services
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
-
Utilities
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
-
Real Estate
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSEF.L
HPRO.L
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSEF.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.15 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 1.06 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 3.34 | +9.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSEF.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 0.87 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.07 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.21 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSEF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, smaller than the maximum HPRO.L drawdown of -36.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSEF.L and HPRO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSEF.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.33% | -36.31% | +12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -8.96% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -17.45% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | -30.68% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -15.54% | +13.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -12.03% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.85% | +0.02% |
Volatility
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) at 3.15%. This indicates that HSEF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPRO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSEF.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 3.15% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 8.69% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.77% | 10.95% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 14.06% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 15.59% | +0.12% |
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSEF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HPRO.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSEF.L vs. HPRO.L - Dividend Comparison
HSEF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
HSEF.L HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSEF.L and HPRO.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSEF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSEF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRO.L.
HSEF.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HPRO.L is REIT. HSEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while HPRO.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSEF.L and 0.24% for HPRO.L.
Find the right allocation for HSEF.L and HPRO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer