PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSBC vs. WF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HSBC vs. WF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) and Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSBC achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than WF's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HSBC has outperformed WF with an annualized return of 18.39%, while WF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.01% annualized return.


HSBC

1D
2.15%
1M
2.72%
YTD
21.78%
6M
27.76%
1Y
64.27%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
32.55%
10Y*
18.39%

WF

1D
2.30%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
5.94%
6M
10.62%
1Y
39.84%
3Y*
39.21%
5Y*
22.39%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSBC vs. WF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
21.78%67.91%34.48%39.45%7.79%20.76%-31.71%1.44%-16.05%36.04%
WF
Woori Financial Group Inc.
5.94%99.65%16.76%13.14%-7.19%18.91%-9.52%-28.16%-5.75%40.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HSBC and WF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HSBC:

$320.51B

WF:

$16.13B

EPS

HSBC:

$6.38

WF:

₩12.69K

PE Ratio

HSBC:

14.52

WF:

7.46

PEG Ratio

HSBC:

0.71

WF:

1.06

PS Ratio

HSBC:

2.52

WF:

1.68

PB Ratio

HSBC:

1.84

WF:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

HSBC:

$128.37B

WF:

₩14.13T

Gross Profit (TTM)

HSBC:

$65.42B

WF:

₩7.05T

EBITDA (TTM)

HSBC:

$34.27B

WF:

₩4.72T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSBC vs. WF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSBC
HSBC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HSBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

WF
WF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSBC vs. WF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) and Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSBCWFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

1.25

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

3.12

+10.29

HSBC vs. WF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the WF Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSBC and WF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSBC vs. WF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSBC drawdown since its inception was -74.47%, smaller than the maximum WF drawdown of -89.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBC and WF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSBCWFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.47%

-89.46%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

-30.99%

+14.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

-30.99%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.80%

-43.52%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.26%

-70.84%

+8.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-26.27%

+23.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.09%

-42.89%

+18.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

12.45%

-7.84%

Volatility

HSBC vs. WF - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF) at 9.16%. This indicates that HSBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSBCWFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

9.16%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.25%

26.06%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.11%

34.04%

-6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.95%

31.02%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.62%

33.47%

-7.85%

Dividends

HSBC vs. WF - Dividend Comparison

HSBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than WF's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
4.05%4.19%8.29%6.54%4.33%3.65%4.05%6.52%6.20%4.94%6.35%6.33%
WF
Woori Financial Group Inc.
0.69%3.84%12.93%2.71%8.20%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%3.29%7.86%

Financials

HSBC vs. WF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HSBC Holdings plc and Woori Financial Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T6.00T7.00T20222023202420252026
32.92B
847.95B
(HSBC) Total Revenue
(WF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HSBC values in USD, WF values in KRW

HSBC vs. WF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HSBC Holdings plc and Woori Financial Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
51.4%
100.0%
Portfolio components
HSBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 16.93B and revenue of 32.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

WF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woori Financial Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 847.95B and revenue of 847.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

HSBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported an operating income of 9.36B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

WF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woori Financial Group Inc. reported an operating income of 847.95B and revenue of 847.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

HSBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a net income of 7.33B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.

WF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woori Financial Group Inc. reported a net income of 638.92B and revenue of 847.95B, resulting in a net margin of 75.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HSBC and WF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSBC has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to WF (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSBC dropped -74.47% vs WF's -89.46%.

HSBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSBC and WF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer