HSAFX vs. TTIFX
HSAFX (Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund) and TTIFX (Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, HSAFX returned 1.83%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for TTIFX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSAFX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for TTIFX.
Performance
HSAFX vs. TTIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSAFX achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than TTIFX's 0.28% return.
HSAFX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- -0.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
TTIFX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- —
HSAFX vs. TTIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund | -1.40% | 7.78% | 1.74% | 0.65% | 4.42% | 7.23% | 11.20% | -0.37% |
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 0.28% | 6.79% | -2.91% | 6.04% | 0.93% | 8.25% | 5.13% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSAFX and TTIFX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019 | 0.23 |
The correlation between HSAFX and TTIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSAFX vs. TTIFX — Risk / Return Rank
HSAFX
TTIFX
HSAFX vs. TTIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.38 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 2.47 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 7.41 | -7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 1.89 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.50 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
HSAFX vs. TTIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSAFX drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum TTIFX drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSAFX and TTIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -13.21% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.34% | -2.11% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.34% | -9.04% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.54% | -9.04% | +3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -1.64% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -2.13% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 0.68% | +1.23% |
Volatility
HSAFX vs. TTIFX - Volatility Comparison
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) at 0.77%. This indicates that HSAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 0.77% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | 1.98% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.61% | 2.75% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 5.92% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 5.89% | -0.77% |
HSAFX vs. TTIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSAFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TTIFX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSAFX vs. TTIFX - Dividend Comparison
HSAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than TTIFX's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.15% | 1.60% | 19.12% | 3.37% | 5.55% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 3.00% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 5.33% | 0.84% | 2.02% | 4.71% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSAFX and TTIFX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSAFX has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to TTIFX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSAFX dropped -5.54% vs TTIFX's -13.21%.
TTIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSAFX and TTIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer