HRSCX vs. UMBHX
HRSCX (Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from Carillon Family of Funds. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HRSCX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
HRSCX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HRSCX
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- YTD
- 19.18%
- 1Y
- 31.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HRSCX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HRSCX Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.32% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRSCX and UMBHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRSCX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
HRSCX
UMBHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HRSCX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HRSCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HRSCX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRSCX drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSCX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRSCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.68% | -6.82% | -48.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -6.82% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -2.16% | -9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility
HRSCX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRSCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.94% | 31.26% | -10.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.81% | 31.26% | -7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 31.26% | -7.25% |
HRSCX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRSCX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HRSCX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
HRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRSCX Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund | 7.07% | 8.42% | 22.56% | 9.37% | 38.95% | 40.00% | 18.51% | 6.62% | 26.17% | 8.10% | 0.06% | 7.03% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, HRSCX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for HRSCX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer