PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRL vs. NWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HRL vs. NWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRL achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than NWN's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HRL has underperformed NWN with an annualized return of -1.18%, while NWN has yielded a comparatively higher 0.95% annualized return.


HRL

1D
-1.42%
1M
1.73%
6M
4.30%
YTD
9.69%
1Y
-6.30%
3Y*
-11.32%
5Y*
-8.56%
10Y*
-1.18%
ALL TIME*
9.31%

NWN

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.39%
6M
7.11%
YTD
7.82%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
0.95%
ALL TIME*
7.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$92.12M$94.55M$119.06M
$10.16M$10.61M$13.82M

HRL vs. NWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
9.69%-21.27%1.21%-27.49%-4.67%6.99%5.38%7.85%19.68%6.72%
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
7.82%23.75%6.77%-14.45%1.49%10.26%-35.52%25.46%4.48%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between HRL and NWN is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.24

The correlation between HRL and NWN shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HRL:

$13.76B

NWN:

$2.06B

EPS

HRL:

$0.85

NWN:

$4.49

PE Ratio

HRL:

29.50

NWN:

10.90

PS Ratio

HRL:

1.13

NWN:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

HRL:

$12.22B

NWN:

$1.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HRL:

$1.92B

NWN:

$288.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

HRL:

$868.07M

NWN:

$426.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRL vs. NWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HRL
HRL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRL Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

NWN
NWN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HRL vs. NWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRLNWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.25

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

2.06

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

5.01

-5.36

HRL vs. NWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRL Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the NWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRL and NWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRL vs. NWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRL drawdown since its inception was -58.46%, which is greater than NWN's maximum drawdown of -46.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRL and NWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRLNWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.46%

-46.27%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.82%

-13.46%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.94%

-15.14%

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.46%

-32.09%

-26.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.46%

-46.27%

-12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.75%

-16.22%

-30.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-12.15%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.70%

5.53%

+12.17%

Volatility

HRL vs. NWN - Volatility Comparison

Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) have volatilities of 6.95% and 6.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRLNWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

6.67%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.46%

16.71%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.32%

20.31%

+10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.45%

22.83%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

28.19%

-4.74%

Dividends

HRL vs. NWN - Dividend Comparison

HRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than NWN's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
4.67%4.89%3.60%3.43%2.28%2.01%2.00%1.86%1.76%1.87%1.67%1.26%
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
4.03%4.20%4.94%4.99%4.06%3.94%4.16%2.58%3.13%3.16%3.13%3.68%

Financials

HRL vs. NWN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hormel Foods Corporation and Northwest Natural Holding Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

HRL vs. NWN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hormel Foods Corporation and Northwest Natural Holding Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

HRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.51M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

NWN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 490.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 217.11M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

NWN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported an operating income of 162.87M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.2%.

HRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a net income of 157.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

NWN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a net income of 97.49M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HRL and NWN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRL has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to NWN (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRL dropped -58.46% vs NWN's -46.27%.

NWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRL and NWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer