PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRL vs. GRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HRL vs. GRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRL achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 78.10% return. Over the past 10 years, HRL has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of -0.65%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.


HRL

1D
1.27%
1M
24.31%
YTD
7.27%
6M
5.70%
1Y
-16.31%
3Y*
-11.95%
5Y*
-9.78%
10Y*
-0.65%

GRC

1D
2.14%
1M
12.41%
YTD
78.10%
6M
71.53%
1Y
133.46%
3Y*
48.08%
5Y*
21.07%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRL vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
7.27%-21.27%1.21%-27.49%-4.67%6.99%5.38%7.85%19.68%6.72%
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp Company
78.10%28.24%8.87%42.15%-41.17%39.71%-11.90%17.64%11.75%2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between HRL and GRC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HRL:

$13.63B

GRC:

$2.23B

EPS

HRL:

$0.85

GRC:

$2.23

PE Ratio

HRL:

29.19

GRC:

37.88

PS Ratio

HRL:

1.12

GRC:

3.20

PB Ratio

HRL:

1.25

GRC:

2.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

HRL:

$12.22B

GRC:

$695.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HRL:

$1.92B

GRC:

$210.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

HRL:

$868.07M

GRC:

$118.94M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRL vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRL
HRL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GRC
GRC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRC Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRL vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRLGRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.59

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

9.33

-9.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

28.85

-29.59

HRL vs. GRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRL Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the GRC Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRL and GRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRL vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRL drawdown since its inception was -58.46%, smaller than the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRL and GRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRLGRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.46%

-67.23%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.29%

-14.39%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.94%

-26.87%

-20.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.46%

-49.26%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.46%

-49.26%

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.92%

0.00%

-47.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.87%

-17.63%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.91%

4.67%

+17.24%

Volatility

HRL vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison

Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) at 10.35%. This indicates that HRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRLGRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.54%

10.35%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.70%

28.10%

-7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.58%

34.75%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.09%

30.83%

-6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.32%

34.02%

-10.70%

Dividends

HRL vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison

HRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than GRC's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp Company
0.89%1.56%1.91%1.98%2.67%1.43%1.82%1.47%7.74%1.51%1.39%1.52%
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
4.71%4.89%3.60%3.43%2.28%2.01%2.00%1.86%1.76%1.87%1.67%1.26%

Financials

HRL vs. GRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hormel Foods Corporation and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
2.97B
176.59M
(HRL) Total Revenue
(GRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HRL vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hormel Foods Corporation and The Gorman-Rupp Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
17.4%
32.5%
Portfolio components
HRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.51M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

GRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 57.36M and revenue of 176.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

HRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 217.11M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

GRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 27.48M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

HRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a net income of 157.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

GRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HRL and GRC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRL has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to GRC (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRL dropped -58.46% vs GRC's -67.23%.

GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRL and GRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer