PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRL vs. FUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HRL vs. FUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRL achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's -5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, HRL has underperformed FUL with an annualized return of -1.19%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively higher 3.34% annualized return.


HRL

1D
1.64%
1M
1.19%
6M
9.35%
YTD
7.18%
1Y
-14.90%
3Y*
-10.78%
5Y*
-9.39%
10Y*
-1.19%

FUL

1D
1.47%
1M
-12.09%
6M
-13.96%
YTD
-5.25%
1Y
-10.17%
3Y*
-5.92%
5Y*
-1.62%
10Y*
3.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRL vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
7.18%-21.27%1.21%-27.49%-4.67%6.99%5.38%7.85%19.68%6.72%
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
-5.25%-10.46%-16.19%14.97%-10.59%57.84%2.15%22.42%-19.84%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between HRL and FUL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HRL:

$13.61B

FUL:

$3.01B

EPS

HRL:

$0.85

FUL:

$3.36

PE Ratio

HRL:

29.16

FUL:

16.65

PS Ratio

HRL:

1.11

FUL:

0.88

PB Ratio

HRL:

1.25

FUL:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

HRL:

$12.22B

FUL:

$3.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HRL:

$1.92B

FUL:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

HRL:

$868.07M

FUL:

$511.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRL vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRL
HRL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FUL
FUL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRL vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRLFULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.97

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.42

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

-1.26

+0.37

HRL vs. FUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRL Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the FUL Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRL and FUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRL vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRL drawdown since its inception was -58.46%, smaller than the maximum FUL drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRL and FUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRLFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.46%

-68.25%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.07%

-26.97%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.94%

-43.45%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.46%

-43.45%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.46%

-56.29%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.97%

-33.40%

-14.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.94%

-18.78%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.38%

9.16%

+13.22%

Volatility

HRL vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) is 9.17%, while H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a volatility of 11.36%. This indicates that HRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRLFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.17%

11.36%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.90%

28.21%

-6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.46%

33.74%

-3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.37%

29.70%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.41%

31.17%

-7.76%

Dividends

HRL vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison

HRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than FUL's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.70%1.56%1.29%0.99%1.03%0.82%1.25%1.23%1.44%1.10%1.14%1.40%
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
4.71%4.89%3.60%3.43%2.28%2.01%2.00%1.86%1.76%1.87%1.67%1.26%

Financials

HRL vs. FUL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hormel Foods Corporation and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
2.97B
950.27M
(HRL) Total Revenue
(FUL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HRL vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hormel Foods Corporation and H.B. Fuller Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
17.4%
33.9%
Portfolio components
HRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.51M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

FUL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

HRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 217.11M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

FUL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

HRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a net income of 157.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

FUL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HRL and FUL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUL has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to HRL (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRL dropped -58.46% vs FUL's -68.25%.

FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRL and FUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer