HRL vs. FUL
HRL (Hormel Foods Corporation) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. HRL operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, HRL returned -1.18%/yr vs 3.18%/yr for FUL. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HRL vs. FUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRL achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's -5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, HRL has underperformed FUL with an annualized return of -1.18%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively higher 3.18% annualized return.
HRL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- -11.32%
- 5Y*
- -8.56%
- 10Y*
- -1.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.31%
FUL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- YTD
- -5.87%
- 1Y
- -0.01%
- 3Y*
- -7.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.21M | $42.96M | $45.53M | |
| $92.12M | $94.55M | $119.06M |
HRL vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRL Hormel Foods Corporation | 9.69% | -21.27% | 1.21% | -27.49% | -4.67% | 6.99% | 5.38% | 7.85% | 19.68% | 6.72% |
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | -5.87% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRL and FUL is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
HRL:
$13.76B
FUL:
$2.97B
HRL:
$0.85
FUL:
$3.36
HRL:
29.50
FUL:
16.47
HRL:
1.13
FUL:
0.87
HRL:
1.27
FUL:
1.46
HRL:
$12.22B
FUL:
$3.51B
HRL:
$1.92B
FUL:
$1.14B
HRL:
$868.07M
FUL:
$511.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRL vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank
HRL
FUL
HRL vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HRL | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.03 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | -0.00 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | -0.00 | -0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HRL vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRL drawdown since its inception was -58.46%, smaller than the maximum FUL drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRL and FUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRL | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.46% | -68.25% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.82% | -26.97% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.94% | -43.45% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.46% | -43.45% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.46% | -56.29% | -2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.75% | -33.83% | -12.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -18.80% | +6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.70% | 9.52% | +8.18% |
Volatility
HRL vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) is 6.95%, while H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that HRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRL | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 8.05% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.46% | 27.24% | -5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.32% | 33.78% | -3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 29.76% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 31.21% | -7.76% |
Dividends
HRL vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison
HRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FUL's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.74% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
HRL Hormel Foods Corporation | 4.67% | 4.89% | 3.60% | 3.43% | 2.28% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 1.87% | 1.67% | 1.26% |
Financials
HRL vs. FUL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hormel Foods Corporation and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HRL vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison
HRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.51M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
HRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 217.11M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
HRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a net income of 157.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HRL and FUL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to HRL (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRL dropped -58.46% vs FUL's -68.25%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HRL and FUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer