PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRCPX vs. FOCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRCPX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 27.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HRCPX has underperformed FOCPX with an annualized return of 17.85%, while FOCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.63% annualized return.


HRCPX

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.57%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.54%
1Y
33.82%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
17.85%

FOCPX

1D
0.78%
1M
10.68%
YTD
27.59%
6M
28.74%
1Y
61.90%
3Y*
34.85%
5Y*
19.55%
10Y*
22.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
11.31%23.00%35.17%39.55%-29.18%30.55%28.89%31.50%-7.37%31.43%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
27.59%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HRCPX and FOCPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 1985

0.85

The correlation between HRCPX and FOCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.97 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRCPX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRCPX
HRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRCPXFOCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

3.55

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

4.40

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.59

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

5.57

-2.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.67

24.59

-14.92

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the FOCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRCPX and FOCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRCPXFOCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

3.55

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.87

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.01

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.66

-0.06

Drawdowns

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRCPX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, smaller than the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRCPX and FOCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRCPXFOCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.83%

-70.25%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-11.29%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

-24.82%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.75%

-37.05%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.85%

-37.05%

+5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-17.01%

+7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.55%

+1.04%

Volatility

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) is 3.59%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that HRCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRCPXFOCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

5.41%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

13.89%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

17.71%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

22.66%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

22.44%

-1.24%

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRCPX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCPX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRCPX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison

HRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than FOCPX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.09%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
3.70%4.11%12.74%11.75%21.31%6.96%15.23%1.57%10.41%6.44%6.36%15.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, HRCPX and FOCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCPX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to HRCPX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRCPX dropped -56.83% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRCPX and FOCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer