HRAAX vs. SIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX).
HRAAX is managed by Hartford. It was launched on May 27, 2004. SIFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012.
Performance
HRAAX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HRAAX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRAAX Hartford Growth Allocation Fund | -1.23% | 17.15% | 17.00% | 14.99% | -16.26% | 13.52% | 13.08% | 22.02% | -7.40% | 18.48% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 8.33% | 7.82% | 4.08% | -1.74% | 8.48% | 10.83% | -1.59% | 5.68% | -3.64% | -1.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRAAX achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HRAAX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.85% annualized return.
HRAAX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 15.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
SIFAX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 10.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HRAAX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRAAX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HRAAX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
HRAAX
SIFAX
HRAAX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRAAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.93 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 2.70 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 3.28 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 8.54 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRAAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.93 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 1.22 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.75 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.35 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between HRAAX and SIFAX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HRAAX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison
HRAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than SIFAX's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRAAX Hartford Growth Allocation Fund | 10.95% | 10.81% | 4.68% | 1.56% | 6.56% | 7.71% | 4.06% | 4.36% | 3.88% | 2.37% | 0.43% | 7.14% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 4.20% | 4.55% | 3.25% | 3.82% | 11.90% | 7.89% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.90% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
HRAAX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRAAX drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRAAX and SIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRAAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | -23.62% | -25.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -2.95% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | -8.32% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | -14.69% | -15.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -0.92% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -8.65% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.18% | +0.96% |
Volatility
HRAAX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.15%. This indicates that HRAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HRAAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 2.15% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 3.98% | +4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 5.32% | +8.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 5.50% | +7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 5.17% | +8.63% |