PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQU.TO vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
-13.35%26.77%40.01%61.47%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
115.93%-20.93%-23.58%-29.23%
Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while WTIU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WTIU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a -13.35% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 115.93% return.


HQU.TO

1D
7.32%
1M
-10.19%
YTD
-13.35%
6M
-12.59%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
32.64%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
26.83%

WTIU

1D
-11.96%
1M
19.03%
YTD
115.93%
6M
89.31%
1Y
42.67%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQU.TOWTIUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.53

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.17

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.81

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.37

1.45

+2.92

HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and WTIU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQU.TOWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.53

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.04

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and WTIU is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither HQU.TO nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and WTIU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HQU.TOWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-75.73%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-53.11%

+27.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.43%

-24.42%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.79%

-39.49%

-16.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

28.53%

-20.58%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) is 13.55%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 22.99%. This indicates that HQU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HQU.TOWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.55%

22.99%

-9.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.67%

46.40%

-20.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.85%

81.25%

-36.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.92%

68.37%

-23.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.77%

68.37%

-23.60%