HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO
HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) and YPLT.NEO (Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest, while YPLT.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HPYM.TO returned 1.54% vs -6.77% for YPLT.NEO. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. HPYM.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for YPLT.NEO.
Performance
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPYM.TO achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly higher than YPLT.NEO's -29.50% return.
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YPLT.NEO
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -25.64%
- YTD
- -29.50%
- 6M
- -31.20%
- 1Y
- -6.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | -0.87% | 6.04% |
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -29.50% | 62.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPYM.TO and YPLT.NEO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
HPYM.TO
YPLT.NEO
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HPYM.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | -0.16 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | -0.33 | +1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPYM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum YPLT.NEO drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYM.TO and YPLT.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPYM.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -42.43% | +36.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.87% | -42.43% | +38.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -40.50% | +38.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -16.37% | +14.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 20.91% | -19.39% |
Volatility
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) is 1.72%, while Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) has a volatility of 19.26%. This indicates that HPYM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YPLT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPYM.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 19.26% | -17.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.60% | 47.78% | -44.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67% | 61.24% | -56.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 69.28% | -63.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 69.28% | -63.66% |
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPYM.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than YPLT.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPYM.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Dividend Comparison
HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, less than YPLT.NEO's 64.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.31% | 9.01% | 8.07% |
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 64.26% | 14.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPYM.TO and YPLT.NEO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YPLT.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YPLT.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HPYM.TO.
HPYM.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while YPLT.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HPYM.TO and 0.40% for YPLT.NEO.
Find the right allocation for HPYM.TO and YPLT.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer