HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO
HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) and BXF.TO (CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past year, HPYM.TO returned 1.54% vs 2.70% for BXF.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPYM.TO achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than BXF.TO's 1.25% return.
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | -0.87% | 6.72% | -0.50% |
BXF.TO CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF | 1.25% | 3.86% | 5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPYM.TO and BXF.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HPYM.TO
BXF.TO
HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF (BXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HPYM.TO | BXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.74 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 5.46 | -4.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPYM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum BXF.TO drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYM.TO and BXF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPYM.TO | BXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.99% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.87% | -1.55% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -0.11% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -1.16% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 0.51% | +1.01% |
Volatility
HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF (BXF.TO) at 0.67%. This indicates that HPYM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPYM.TO | BXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 0.67% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.60% | 2.28% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67% | 3.06% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 3.55% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 3.61% | +2.01% |
Dividends
HPYM.TO vs. BXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than BXF.TO's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXF.TO CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF | 2.97% | 2.91% | 3.29% | 2.58% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.67% | 1.75% | 1.55% | 1.17% | 1.19% | 1.24% |
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.31% | 9.01% | 8.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPYM.TO and BXF.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and CI.
Find the right allocation for HPYM.TO and BXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer