HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO
HPYE.TO (Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF) and HLIF.TO (Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HPYE.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HLIF.TO.
Performance
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HPYE.TO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLIF.TO
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 6M
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 37.75%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HPYE.TO Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF | 10.25% |
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 13.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPYE.TO and HLIF.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HPYE.TO
HLIF.TO
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF (HPYE.TO) and Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPYE.TO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.35 | 1.47 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPYE.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum HLIF.TO drawdown of -11.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYE.TO and HLIF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPYE.TO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -11.12% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.02% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPYE.TO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 6.89% | +6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 10.48% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 10.48% | +2.45% |
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPYE.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than HLIF.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HPYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than HLIF.TO's 6.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 6.02% | 6.26% | 7.33% | 7.96% | 3.91% |
HPYE.TO Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF | 5.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPYE.TO and HLIF.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HPYE.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPYE.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HLIF.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HPYE.TO and 0.79% for HLIF.TO.
Find the right allocation for HPYE.TO and HLIF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer