HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L
HPRO.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) and HSTE.L (HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HPRO.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSTE.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HPRO.L returned -0.95%/yr vs -8.23%/yr for HSTE.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HPRO.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HSTE.L.
Performance
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HPRO.L is traded in GBp, while HSTE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HSTE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPRO.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly higher than HSTE.L's -9.47% return.
HPRO.L
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
HSTE.L
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- -9.47%
- 6M
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- -1.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- -8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 5.03% | 0.35% | -1.94% | 1.11% | -18.31% | 24.70% | -1.08% |
HSTE.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | -9.47% | 15.69% | 21.79% | -13.02% | -19.43% | -32.25% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPRO.L and HSTE.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020 | 0.20 |
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HPRO.L
HSTE.L
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HPRO.L
HSTE.L
-
Technology
HPRO.L
HSTE.L
Consumer Cyclical
HPRO.L
HSTE.L
Financial Services
HPRO.L
HSTE.L
-
Basic Materials
HPRO.L
-
HSTE.L
-
Communication Services
HPRO.L
-
HSTE.L
Consumer Defensive
HPRO.L
-
HSTE.L
-
Energy
HPRO.L
-
HSTE.L
-
Healthcare
HPRO.L
-
HSTE.L
Industrials
HPRO.L
-
HSTE.L
-
Utilities
HPRO.L
-
HSTE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPRO.L
HSTE.L
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPRO.L | HSTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.05 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | -0.10 | +3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPRO.L | HSTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | -0.06 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.22 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.22 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPRO.L drawdown since its inception was -36.31%, smaller than the maximum HSTE.L drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRO.L and HSTE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPRO.L | HSTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.31% | -69.87% | +33.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -29.96% | +21.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.45% | -33.85% | +16.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.68% | -60.64% | +29.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -52.10% | +36.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -49.98% | +37.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 16.42% | -13.59% |
Volatility
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) is 3.15%, while HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that HPRO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSTE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPRO.L | HSTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 10.34% | -7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 19.23% | -10.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 26.54% | -15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 38.02% | -23.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 37.71% | -22.11% |
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPRO.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HSTE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPRO.L vs. HSTE.L - Dividend Comparison
HPRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while HSTE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
HSTE.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPRO.L and HSTE.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HPRO.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPRO.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HSTE.L.
HPRO.L is categorized as REIT, while HSTE.L is Technology Equities. HPRO.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSTE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRO.L and 0.50% for HSTE.L.
Find the right allocation for HPRO.L and HSTE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer