PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPRO.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than HSPX.L's 10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, HPRO.L has underperformed HSPX.L with an annualized return of 1.14%, while HSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.23% annualized return.


HPRO.L

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
5.03%
6M
4.88%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*
1.14%

HSPX.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
5.91%
YTD
10.49%
6M
10.32%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
16.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HPRO.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
5.03%0.35%-1.94%1.11%-18.31%24.70%-14.95%13.99%-3.06%-1.31%
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.49%9.36%27.32%19.94%-9.10%30.95%13.89%26.37%0.09%10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HPRO.L and HSPX.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2011

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between HPRO.L and HSPX.L has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HPRO.L
HSPX.L

Real Estate

99.6%
1.9%

Technology

0.4%
38.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
9.9%

Financial Services

0.0%
11.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.4%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Real Estate

HPRO.L
99.6%
HSPX.L
1.9%

Technology

HPRO.L
0.4%
HSPX.L
38.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HPRO.L
0.0%
HSPX.L
9.9%

Financial Services

HPRO.L
0.0%
HSPX.L
11.3%

Basic Materials

HPRO.L

-

HSPX.L
1.7%

Communication Services

HPRO.L

-

HSPX.L
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

HPRO.L

-

HSPX.L
4.7%

Energy

HPRO.L

-

HSPX.L
3.4%

Healthcare

HPRO.L

-

HSPX.L
8.4%

Industrials

HPRO.L

-

HSPX.L
7.8%

Utilities

HPRO.L

-

HSPX.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPRO.L
HPRO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HPRO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HSPX.L
HSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPRO.LHSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.51

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

4.05

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

14.81

-11.51

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPRO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPRO.L and HSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPRO.LHSPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.72

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

1.05

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

1.05

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.97

-0.76

Drawdowns

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPRO.L drawdown since its inception was -36.31%, which is greater than HSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRO.L and HSPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPRO.LHSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.31%

-25.43%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-7.16%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.45%

-20.76%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.68%

-20.76%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-25.43%

-10.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.56%

-0.26%

-15.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-3.44%

-8.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.96%

+0.87%

Volatility

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that HPRO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPRO.LHSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.65%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

7.23%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

10.71%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

14.22%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

15.47%

+0.13%

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPRO.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

HPRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than HSPX.L's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPRO.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.82%0.93%0.98%1.19%1.27%0.95%1.41%1.47%1.60%1.54%1.49%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HPRO.L and HSPX.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRO.L.

HPRO.L is categorized as REIT, while HSPX.L is S&P 500. HPRO.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRO.L and 0.09% for HSPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPRO.L and HSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer