HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L
HPRO.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) and HSPX.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HPRO.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HPRO.L returned 1.14%/yr vs 16.23%/yr for HSPX.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HPRO.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for HSPX.L.
Performance
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPRO.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than HSPX.L's 10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, HPRO.L has underperformed HSPX.L with an annualized return of 1.14%, while HSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.23% annualized return.
HPRO.L
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
HSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 5.03% | 0.35% | -1.94% | 1.11% | -18.31% | 24.70% | -14.95% | 13.99% | -3.06% | -1.31% |
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.49% | 9.36% | 27.32% | 19.94% | -9.10% | 30.95% | 13.89% | 26.37% | 0.09% | 10.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPRO.L and HSPX.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2011 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HPRO.L and HSPX.L has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HPRO.L
HSPX.L
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HPRO.L
HSPX.L
Technology
HPRO.L
HSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
HPRO.L
HSPX.L
Financial Services
HPRO.L
HSPX.L
Basic Materials
HPRO.L
-
HSPX.L
Communication Services
HPRO.L
-
HSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
HPRO.L
-
HSPX.L
Energy
HPRO.L
-
HSPX.L
Healthcare
HPRO.L
-
HSPX.L
Industrials
HPRO.L
-
HSPX.L
Utilities
HPRO.L
-
HSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPRO.L
HSPX.L
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPRO.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.51 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 4.05 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 14.81 | -11.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPRO.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 2.72 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 1.05 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 1.05 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.97 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPRO.L drawdown since its inception was -36.31%, which is greater than HSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRO.L and HSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPRO.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.31% | -25.43% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -7.16% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.45% | -20.76% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.68% | -20.76% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -25.43% | -10.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -0.26% | -15.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -3.44% | -8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 1.96% | +0.87% |
Volatility
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that HPRO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPRO.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 2.65% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 7.23% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 10.71% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 14.22% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 15.47% | +0.13% |
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPRO.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HPRO.L vs. HSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
HPRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than HSPX.L's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 0.95% | 1.41% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPRO.L and HSPX.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRO.L.
HPRO.L is categorized as REIT, while HSPX.L is S&P 500. HPRO.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRO.L and 0.09% for HSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for HPRO.L and HSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer